Knowledge Management

Spunk forwarder scalability

dimitarvalov
Engager

I'm considering usage of splunk-forwarder to integrate a system that generates many small files that contain log messages, i.e. at times more than a thousand per second. Once the files reach splunk they can be deleted.

I wonder how will the forwarded handle this situation. I've read that it can monitor well about a 100 files. Should I implement other jobs to move the processed files and how should I know if a file is processed?

The other approach that I could take is to change the system to log a rotating file. So which one do you think is better?

0 Karma
1 Solution

echalex
Builder

I would say prefer to log to a rotating file. I have experience from Splunking an application that was producing several thousand files an hour and it was not pretty. Monitoring that amount of files will result in a performance hit which is disproportionate to the amount of data to be ingested.

Therefore: prefer fewer log files.

View solution in original post

echalex
Builder

I would say prefer to log to a rotating file. I have experience from Splunking an application that was producing several thousand files an hour and it was not pretty. Monitoring that amount of files will result in a performance hit which is disproportionate to the amount of data to be ingested.

Therefore: prefer fewer log files.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Introducing the Splunk Community Dashboard Challenge!

Welcome to Splunk Community Dashboard Challenge! This is your chance to showcase your skills in creating ...

Get the T-shirt to Prove You Survived Splunk University Bootcamp

As if Splunk University, in Las Vegas, in-person, with three days of bootcamps and labs weren’t enough, now ...

Wondering How to Build Resiliency in the Cloud?

IT leaders are choosing Splunk Cloud as an ideal cloud transformation platform to drive business resilience,  ...