Knowledge Management

[Smartstore]Is maxVolumeDataSizeMB relevent for mixed local and remote index cluster

rbal_splunk
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

I wanted to get confirmation on how space is managed on a mixed local and remote index cluster.

I know that maxVolumeDataSizeMB is ignored on remote/s3 enabled indexes, and that eviction_padding in server.conf can control how the cachemanager will start evicting from local cache on the indexers.

Labels (1)
Tags (1)
0 Karma

rbal_splunk
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

maxvolumedatasizeMB is ignored and can lead to disk filling up unexpectedly. Depending on version of splunk, it will either start evicting evictable buckets at the eviction_padding threshold or it wont evict and then eventually pause indexing when it hits minfreespace.

Advice is not to have s2 indexes and non-s2 indexes in the same volume with maxvolumedatasizeMB as it's unlikely either of the above behaviors are desired. They should keep non-s2 and s2 indexes in separate volumes.

0 Karma

srajarat2
Path Finder

How about the indexes that were migrated to SmartStore? The homePath remains the same after migration and it refers to a volume that had maxVolumeDataSizeMB.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

More Ways To Control Your Costs With Archived Metrics | Register for Tech Talk

Tuesday, May 14, 2024  |  11AM PT / 2PM ET Register to Attend Join us for this Tech Talk and learn how to ...

.conf24 | Personalize your .conf experience with Learning Paths!

Personalize your .conf24 Experience Learning paths allow you to level up your skill sets and dive deeper ...

Threat Hunting Unlocked: How to Uplevel Your Threat Hunting With the PEAK Framework ...

WATCH NOWAs AI starts tackling low level alerts, it's more critical than ever to uplevel your threat hunting ...