All Apps and Add-ons

Blue Coat ProxySG App for Splunk: Can I get data in a local file instead of TCP streaming?

banderson7
Communicator

I already have proxy logs on my forwarder in the form of forwarded syslogs, but the directions in the app say to set up a TCP receiving input. Can I change this to use my local logs instead?

0 Karma
1 Solution

joel_ebrahimi
Explorer

You can import the data anyway that you look, you just want to set the sourcetype too bluecoat:proxysg:. Where anything can be substituted for how you want to identify the log.

So for the customclient the sourcetype is bluecoat:proxysg:customclient , but in your case you could use bluecoat:proxysg:locallog if you wanted to keep track of the origin.

View solution in original post

joel_ebrahimi
Explorer

You can import the data anyway that you look, you just want to set the sourcetype too bluecoat:proxysg:. Where anything can be substituted for how you want to identify the log.

So for the customclient the sourcetype is bluecoat:proxysg:customclient , but in your case you could use bluecoat:proxysg:locallog if you wanted to keep track of the origin.

mreynov_splunk
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

You may have to adjust sourcetype naming, but otherwise should not be a problem.
Look in the dashboards of the app for the sourcetype it is expecting and do a [sourcetype] rename in the local/props.conf for the app.

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Observability | Use Synthetic Monitoring for Website Metadata Verification

If you are on Splunk Observability Cloud, you may already have Synthetic Monitoringin your observability ...

More Ways To Control Your Costs With Archived Metrics | Register for Tech Talk

Tuesday, May 14, 2024  |  11AM PT / 2PM ET Register to Attend Join us for this Tech Talk and learn how to ...

.conf24 | Personalize your .conf experience with Learning Paths!

Personalize your .conf24 Experience Learning paths allow you to level up your skill sets and dive deeper ...