Getting Data In

When we need si* for summary indexing?

hochit
Path Finder

Is it necessary to use si* command for summary index and we need to make it as scheduled save?

Since I recall the saved search (it's not using si*), it still returns me the result as quick as I recall it from index=summary. Or Splunk actually is doing the trick for me?

rroberts
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

If you havent already seen it there is a good article here and link to video ... http://www.splunk.com/base/Documentation/4.2/Knowledge/Usesummaryindexing

"Note: You do not have to use the si- summary index search commands if you are proficient with the "old-school" way of creating summary-index-populating searches. If you create summary indexes using those methods and they work for you there's no need to update them. In fact, they may be more efficient: there are performance impacts related to the use of the si- commands, because they create slightly larger indexes than the "manual" method does."

gkanapathy
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

Hmm. It's not always true that si generates large results. For example, for computing medians and percentiles, si will likely be considerably more efficient than whatever you come up with manually. However, there will also be cases where you can't use si commands to summarize and retrieve the data as you need.

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Stay Connected: Your Guide to May Tech Talks, Office Hours, and Webinars!

Take a look below to explore our upcoming Community Office Hours, Tech Talks, and Webinars this month. This ...

They're back! Join the SplunkTrust and MVP at .conf24

With our highly anticipated annual conference, .conf, comes the fez-wearers you can trust! The SplunkTrust, as ...

Enterprise Security Content Update (ESCU) | New Releases

Last month, the Splunk Threat Research Team had two releases of new security content via the Enterprise ...