Splunk Search

How to exclude a match in regex - Regex

Kanesol
Explorer

I have this search:

index="blah" source="blah" cs_Referer_="-" NOT(some keyword exclusion here) | regex cs_host="^(\b\d{1,3}.\d{1,3}.\d{1,3}.\d{1,3}\b)+"

and I wish to add this to it as a NOT :

regex cs_uri_stem="\?d=[\w.]+@\w+.\w+"

Not sure how to go about this. Any Input is appreciated.

Tags (1)
1 Solution

hexx
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

I think you've got the most reasonable solution already with this search:

index="blah" source="blah" cs_Referer_="-" NOT(some keyword exclusion here) | regex cs_host="^(\b\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\b)+" | regex cs_uri_stem="\?d=[\w.]+@\w+.\w+"

Attempting to contract both regular expressions into one probably won't yield any performance benefits.

View solution in original post

hexx
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

I think you've got the most reasonable solution already with this search:

index="blah" source="blah" cs_Referer_="-" NOT(some keyword exclusion here) | regex cs_host="^(\b\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\b)+" | regex cs_uri_stem="\?d=[\w.]+@\w+.\w+"

Attempting to contract both regular expressions into one probably won't yield any performance benefits.

Kanesol
Explorer

Thanks for confirming that for me. I was hoping for something a little nicer.

0 Karma

Kanesol
Explorer

To update, I've resorted to just adding more and more pipes for each regex which I believe is not optimal but serviceable. I'm hoping someone can come up with a more elegant way 🙂

index="blah" source="blah" cs_Referer_="-" NOT(some keyword exclusion here) | regex cs_host="^(bd{1,3}.d{1,3}.d{1,3}.d{1,3}b)+" | regex cs_uri_stem!="?d=[w.]+@w+.w+"

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Announcing Scheduled Export GA for Dashboard Studio

We're excited to announce the general availability of Scheduled Export for Dashboard Studio. Starting in ...

Extending Observability Content to Splunk Cloud

Watch Now!   In this Extending Observability Content to Splunk Cloud Tech Talk, you'll see how to leverage ...

More Control Over Your Monitoring Costs with Archived Metrics GA in US-AWS!

What if there was a way you could keep all the metrics data you need while saving on storage costs?This is now ...