Getting Data In

Should we use heavy forwarders as an intermediate layer between the forwarders and the indexers?

danielbb
Motivator

We had this severe issue last week - What can be done when the parsing and aggregation queues are filled up?

Since it took us days to figure it out and the entire indexer cluster was compromised and it took 11 hours with Support on the line to detect it, I wonder whether in general an heavy forwarder layer is a good idea.

Tags (1)
0 Karma

mydog8it
Builder

What problem are you trying to solve by adding a heavy forwarder environment?

0 Karma

danielbb
Motivator

Reducing load on the indexers and isolating issues as I pointed to in the question...

0 Karma

gcusello
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

Hi @danielbb,
I use HFs only when I need them (separated networks or syslogs), if I can I prefer to directly send logs from UFs to Indexers.

Maybe you should understand (with Support help) why you had the above problem, I don't think that an additional HF's layer could solve your problem, probably it could generate more queue problems.

Ciao.
Giuseppe

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Announcing Scheduled Export GA for Dashboard Studio

We're excited to announce the general availability of Scheduled Export for Dashboard Studio. Starting in ...

Extending Observability Content to Splunk Cloud

Watch Now!   In this Extending Observability Content to Splunk Cloud Tech Talk, you'll see how to leverage ...

More Control Over Your Monitoring Costs with Archived Metrics GA in US-AWS!

What if there was a way you could keep all the metrics data you need while saving on storage costs?This is now ...