Knowledge Management

Spunk forwarder scalability

dimitarvalov
Engager

I'm considering usage of splunk-forwarder to integrate a system that generates many small files that contain log messages, i.e. at times more than a thousand per second. Once the files reach splunk they can be deleted.

I wonder how will the forwarded handle this situation. I've read that it can monitor well about a 100 files. Should I implement other jobs to move the processed files and how should I know if a file is processed?

The other approach that I could take is to change the system to log a rotating file. So which one do you think is better?

0 Karma
1 Solution

echalex
Builder

I would say prefer to log to a rotating file. I have experience from Splunking an application that was producing several thousand files an hour and it was not pretty. Monitoring that amount of files will result in a performance hit which is disproportionate to the amount of data to be ingested.

Therefore: prefer fewer log files.

View solution in original post

echalex
Builder

I would say prefer to log to a rotating file. I have experience from Splunking an application that was producing several thousand files an hour and it was not pretty. Monitoring that amount of files will result in a performance hit which is disproportionate to the amount of data to be ingested.

Therefore: prefer fewer log files.

Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Announcing Scheduled Export GA for Dashboard Studio

We're excited to announce the general availability of Scheduled Export for Dashboard Studio. Starting in ...

Extending Observability Content to Splunk Cloud

Watch Now!   In this Extending Observability Content to Splunk Cloud Tech Talk, you'll see how to leverage ...

More Control Over Your Monitoring Costs with Archived Metrics GA in US-AWS!

What if there was a way you could keep all the metrics data you need while saving on storage costs?This is now ...