Security

SSO or Load Balancing for the 8089 Management Port

mikaelbje
Motivator

Hi,

I have a Splunk Search Head Cluster set up with a F5 LTM load balancer in front. This is set up for the Splunk web interface, but would it make sense to do the same for the management port? I don't do any authentication on the F5 LTM.

I'm thinking it shouldn't be a problem as long a we're using sticky sessions and no authentication on the LTM since the 8089 Management Port doesn't honour the X-Remote-User header anyway so we'd have to log in never the less, but what would you suggest?

  1. Use Load Balancing from the LTM to the 3 search heads' Management Ports
  2. Direct requests to one of the search heads?
0 Karma
1 Solution

esix_splunk
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

This would make sense if you're doing a lot of API (REST) calls against the SHC. You can load balance that in the same manner you are doing web (8000 or 443.)

View solution in original post

0 Karma

esix_splunk
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

This would make sense if you're doing a lot of API (REST) calls against the SHC. You can load balance that in the same manner you are doing web (8000 or 443.)

0 Karma

mikaelbje
Motivator

So no pitfalls to be aware of? Nothing in small print stating that this shouldn't be done?

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

.conf24 | Registration Open!

Hello, hello! I come bearing good news: Registration for .conf24 is now open!   conf is Splunk’s rad annual ...

Splunk is officially part of Cisco

Revolutionizing how our customers build resilience across their entire digital footprint.   Splunk ...

Splunk APM & RUM | Planned Maintenance March 26 - March 28, 2024

There will be planned maintenance for Splunk APM and RUM between March 26, 2024 and March 28, 2024 as ...