Getting Data In

Are there adverse affects to having monitors for files that do not exist?

brent_weaver
Builder

I have two platforms to monitor. I want to create one application that I can apply to all hosts that come on board. I know that Spunk will not scream anymore with 6.2.x, but are there adverse affects? Will it create errors in the Spunk log files?

Tags (2)
0 Karma

martin_mueller
SplunkTrust
SplunkTrust

You won't see any errors, not finding a file is expected behaviour. You also won't see any performance issues if you keep the number of monitors reasonable. You might see unexpected indexing if one platform one day happens to create a file in a path that exists in the other platform.

For clarity, maintenance, extendability, fewer cross-platform dependencies, etc. I'd advise to create two tailored apps nonetheless.

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Welcome to the Splunk Community!

(view in My Videos) We're so glad you're here! The Splunk Community is place to connect, learn, give back, and ...

Tech Talk | Elevating Digital Service Excellence: The Synergy of Splunk RUM & APM

Elevating Digital Service Excellence: The Synergy of Real User Monitoring and Application Performance ...

Adoption of RUM and APM at Splunk

    Unleash the power of Splunk Observability   Watch Now In this can't miss Tech Talk! The Splunk Growth ...