Getting Data In

Loadbalancer or intermediate forwarder?

melonman
Motivator

Hi

I have many of universal forwarders that send (autoLB) events to multiple indexers in distributed search mode.
Now I am thinking to put 2 intermediate forwarders OR 2 load-balancers between universal forwarders and indexers.

Question:
Is it safe to use load-balancers between universal forwarders and indexers?
What is the best practice for this?

Thank you in advance..

0 Karma
1 Solution

esix_splunk
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

While you can use a load balancer between the UF and Indexers, why? The UF's have load balancing functionality built in via the outputs. Unless you are trying to redirect traffic to different indexers from specific ip/host ranges. That would be the only benefit.

Intermediate Forwarders are in best practices. They'll buffer if indexers or connections are down, and allow parsing / routing offloads in case of loads on indexers.

View solution in original post

esix_splunk
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

While you can use a load balancer between the UF and Indexers, why? The UF's have load balancing functionality built in via the outputs. Unless you are trying to redirect traffic to different indexers from specific ip/host ranges. That would be the only benefit.

Intermediate Forwarders are in best practices. They'll buffer if indexers or connections are down, and allow parsing / routing offloads in case of loads on indexers.

melonman
Motivator

Thank you!

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

.conf24 | Registration Open!

Hello, hello! I come bearing good news: Registration for .conf24 is now open!   conf is Splunk’s rad annual ...

ICYMI - Check out the latest releases of Splunk Edge Processor

Splunk is pleased to announce the latest enhancements to Splunk Edge Processor.  HEC Receiver authorization ...

Introducing the 2024 SplunkTrust!

Hello, Splunk Community! We are beyond thrilled to announce our newest group of SplunkTrust members!  The ...