All Apps and Add-ons

Add-on for JIRA: How to add multiple fields to initial JQL_Query?

mrfredman
Path Finder

Hi,

I'm attempting to use a standard JQL_Query to filter my JIRA issues down by project and summary before performing any sort of action on them in Splunk, but Splunk only seems to recognize the initial field I enter.

For example, in the following query I get results filtered by Summary but not Project:
|jirarest jqlsearch Summary~"Exercise" AND Project=Support

Do I have the syntax wrong? How can I properly constrain my search from within Splunk?

1 Solution

Flynt
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

Great question! The issue is how you are querying. To the JIRA command

|jirarest jqlsearch Summary~"Exercise" AND Project=Support

Is interpreted as Summary~"Exercise" being the totality of arguments passed. In order for the query to work, I would suggest using single quotes for criteria within double quotes for the whole argument. Something like this.

|jirarest jqlsearch "Summary~'Exercise' AND Project='Support' "

View solution in original post

Flynt
Splunk Employee
Splunk Employee

Great question! The issue is how you are querying. To the JIRA command

|jirarest jqlsearch Summary~"Exercise" AND Project=Support

Is interpreted as Summary~"Exercise" being the totality of arguments passed. In order for the query to work, I would suggest using single quotes for criteria within double quotes for the whole argument. Something like this.

|jirarest jqlsearch "Summary~'Exercise' AND Project='Support' "

mrfredman
Path Finder

Worked perfectly. Thanks!

0 Karma
Get Updates on the Splunk Community!

Announcing Scheduled Export GA for Dashboard Studio

We're excited to announce the general availability of Scheduled Export for Dashboard Studio. Starting in ...

Extending Observability Content to Splunk Cloud

Watch Now!   In this Extending Observability Content to Splunk Cloud Tech Talk, you'll see how to leverage ...

More Control Over Your Monitoring Costs with Archived Metrics GA in US-AWS!

What if there was a way you could keep all the metrics data you need while saving on storage costs?This is now ...